Skip to content

It is often claimed that politics is deeply emotional, and increasingly so. Politicians seem to make more, and more extreme, emotional appeals than ever before. Citizens are angered about politics, or anxious about political developments. Sometimes they are deeply enthusiastic and hopeful about political candidates or political change. Still there are many questions about the role of emotions in politics. How fundamental are they? When they do emerge? And are there differences between people in the emotions they experience. In one of our papers we re-analyze the claim that conservatives have stronger negative emotions than liberals. We find no evidence of this. In another paper, we study emotion as both a physiological response and a self-reported experience. We find that participants self-report to be disgusted by outparty politicians and that they also have physiological responses associated with disgust. However, there is no relation between these two variables. Some people report disgust, but have no physiological response and vice versa. In future work we continue this agenda, as well as looking at the role emotional facial expressions and the cognitive components of anger and anxiety.

Nr. Citation
1 Linda C. Bomm, Paul K. Bergmann, Bert N. Bakker (2025). Threat and Worry, but not Issue Salience, Show Similar Patterns in Means, Correlations, and Ideological Associations Preprint
2 Isabella Rebasso, Matthijs Rooduijn & Gijs Schumacher (2025). Appraisal Theory Predicts Emotions in the General, but Not in the Political Domain. Preprint
3 Christian Pipal, Martijn Schoonvelde, Gijs Schumacher & Max Boiten (2025). JST and rJST: joint estimation of sentiment and topics in textual data using a semi-supervised approach. Communication Methods and Measures
4 Jakob Kasper, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2025). Establishing the Construct and Predictive Validity of Brief Measures of Affective Polarization. European Journal of Political Research
5 Linda C. Bomm, Gijs Schumacher, Frederic Hopp & Bert N. Bakker (2025). The Structure and Correlates of Societal Threat Perceptions: A Network Approach. Preprint
6 Ranganatha, N., Komáromy, D., & Rooduijn, M. (2025). Populism and Affective Polarization Handbook of Affective Polarization
7 Malte Luken, Kody Moodley, Eva Viviani, Christian Pipal, Gijs Schumacher (2024). MEXCA – A Simple and Robust Pipeline for Capturing Emotion Expressions in Faces, Vocalization, and Speech. Preprint
8 Maaike D. Homan & Gijs Schumacher (2024). Examining the Influence of Politicians’ Emotional Appeals on Vote Choice using a Visualized Leader Choice Task. Preprint
9 Christian Pipal, Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Mariken A. C. G. van der Velden (2024). Tone in politics is not systematically related to macro trends, ideology, or experience. Scientific Reports
10 Gijs Schumacher, Maaike D. Homan, Isabella Rebasso, Neil Fasching, Bert N. Bakker & Matthijs Rooduijn (2024). Establishing the validity and robustness of facial electromyography measures for political science. Politics and the Life Sciences
11 Maaike D. Homan, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2024). Facing emotional politicians: Do emotional displays of politicians evoke mimicry and emotional contagion? Emotion
12 Bert N. Bakker, & Yphtach Lelkes (2024). Putting the affect in affective polarization. Cognition & Emotion
13 Roeland Dubel, Maaike D. Homan, Delaney Peterson, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2024). Replicating and extending Soroka, Fournier & Nir (2019): negative news increases arousal and negative affect. Media & Communication.
14 Maaike D. Homan (2024). Citizens’ affective, cognitive and behavioral responses to the emotional displays of politicians. PhD dissertation
15 Christian Pipal (2024). Blueprints and fingerprints Politicians’ use of emotional appeals in European democracies. PhD dissertation
16 Homan, M. D., Hamdan, M., Hendriks, K., & Petropoulus Petalas, D. (2024). Neural Responses to Emotional Displays by Politicians: Differential Mu and Alpha Suppression Patterns in Response to In-Party and Out-Party Leaders. Scientific Reports
17 Komáromy, D., Rooduijn, M., & Schumacher, G. (2024). Mapping the populist mind: A network approach to integrate sociological and psychological models of the populist radical right Frontiers in Political Science
18 Isabella Rebasso (2023). Feeling Within Reason: How Appraisals Shape Emotional Responses to Politics. PhD dissertation
19 Mark Brandt, & Bert N. Bakker (2022). The complicated but solvable threat-politics relationship. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences
20 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Matthijs Rooduijn (2020). Hot Politics? Affective responses to political rhetoric. American Political Science Review
21 Maaike Homan (2020). Alexander Todorov’s Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions. Politics and Life Sciences
22 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Maaike Homan (2020). Yikes. Are we disgusted by politicians? Politics and Life Sciences
Back To Top