Skip to content

 

Nr. Citation
1 Isabella Rebasso, Matthijs Rooduijn & Gijs Schumacher (2025). Appraisal Theory Predicts Emotions in the General, but Not in the Political Domain. Preprint
2 Céline Laffineur, Jakob Kasper, Lysanne te Brinke, Bert N. Bakker & Gijs Schumacher (2025). Political Interest, Activism, and Affective Polarization: Dutch Adolescents and Adults are not that Different. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap
3 Bert N. Bakker & Gijs Schumacher (2025). Using measures of psychophysiological and neural activity to advance understanding of psychological processes in politics. Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology
4 Matthijs Gillissen, Matthijs Rooduijn & Gijs Schumacher (2025). Empathic Concern and Perspective-Taking Have Opposite Effects on Affective Polarization. Journal of Experimental Political Science
5 Delaney Peterson, Matthijs Rooduijn, Frederic R. Hopp, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2025). Loneliness is positively associated with populist radical right support. Social Science & Medicine
6 Christian Pipal, Martijn Schoonvelde, Gijs Schumacher & Max Boiten (2025). JST and rJST: joint estimation of sentiment and topics in textual data using a semi-supervised approach. Communication Methods and Measures
7 Jakob Kasper, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2025). Establishing the Construct and Predictive Validity of Brief Measures of Affective Polarization. European Journal of Political Research
8 Diamantis Petropoulos Petalas, Gijs Schumacher & H. Steven Scholte (2025). Is Political Ideology Correlated with Brain Structure? A Preregistered Replication. iScience
9 Malte Luken, Kody Moodley, Eva Viviani, Christian Pipal, Gijs Schumacher (2024). MEXCA – A Simple and Robust Pipeline for Capturing Emotion Expressions in Faces, Vocalization, and Speech. Preprint
10 Maaike D. Homan & Gijs Schumacher (2024). Examining the Influence of Politicians’ Emotional Appeals on Vote Choice using a Visualized Leader Choice Task. Preprint
11 Linda Bomm, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2024). The Structure and Correlates of Societal Threat Perceptions: A Network Approach. Preprint
12 Céline Laffineur, Bert N. Bakker & Gijs Schumacher (2024). The Social Nature of Political (Dis)Interest: Conceptualizing and Validating Political (Dis)Interest as a Social Identity. Preprint
13 Gustavo Couto de Jesus, Maaike D. Homan, Diamantis Petropoulos Petalas, Bert N.Bakker, Joe Bathelt, and Gijs Schumacher (2024). An EEG-study on the extent to which partisanship conditions the processing of politicians’ faces. Preprint
14 Dániel Komáromy, Matthijs Rooduijn, Gijs Schumacher (2024). Mapping the populist mind: A network approach to integrate sociological and psychological models of the populist radical right. Frontiers in Political Science
15 Christian Pipal, Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Mariken A. C. G. van der Velden (2024). Tone in politics is not systematically related to macro trends, ideology, or experience. Scientific Reports
16 Gijs Schumacher, Maaike D. Homan, Isabella Rebasso, Neil Fasching, Bert N. Bakker & Matthijs Rooduijn (2024). Establishing the validity and robustness of facial electromyography measures for political science. Politics and the Life Sciences
17 Maaike D. Homan, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2024). Facing emotional politicians: Do emotional displays of politicians evoke mimicry and emotional contagion? Emotion
18 Bert N. Bakker, & Yphtach Lelkes (2024). Putting the affect in affective polarization. Cognition & Emotion
19 Kevin Arceneaux, Bert N. Bakker, Neil Fasching & Yphtach Lelkes (2024). A critical evaluation and research agenda for the study of psychological dispositions and political attitudes. Advances in Political Psychology
20 Kevin Arceneaux, Bert N. Bakker, & Gijs Schumacher (2024). Being of One Mind: Does Alignment in Physiological Responses and Subjective Experiences Shape Political Ideology. Political Psychology
21 Roeland Dubel, Maaike D. Homan, Delaney Peterson, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2024). Replicating and extending Soroka, Fournier & Nir (2019): negative news increases arousal and negative affect. Media & Communication.
22 Toshkov, D., Mazepus, H., Yordanova, N., & Piqani, D. (2024). Enforcement and public opinion: The perceived legitimacy of rule of law sanctions. Journal of European Public Policy
23 Laustsen, L., Mazepus, H., van Leeuwen, F., & Bartusevicius, H. (2024). Trait Preferences for Leaders During War: Experimental and Panel-Based Evidence from Ukraine 2022. Preprint
24 Roeland Dubel, Gijs Schumacher, Maaike D. Homan, Delaney Peterson & Bert N. Bakker (2024). Replicating and Extending Soroka, Fournier, and Nir: Negative News Increases Arousal and Negative Affect. Media and Communication
25 Mazepus, H., Osmudsen, M., Bang-Petersen, M., Toshkov, D., & Dimitrova, A. (2023). Information battleground: Conflict perceptions motivate the belief in and sharing of misinformation about the adversary. PLOS ONE
26 Peresman, A., Larsen, L. T., Mazepus, H., & Petersen, M. B. (2023). Populists are skeptical to expert advice but respond to better arguments. Preprint
27 Rimkutė, D., & Mazepus, H. (2023). A widening authority–legitimacy gap in EU regulatory governance? An experimental study of the European Medicines Agency’s legitimacy in health security regulation. Journal of European Public Policy
28 Bartusevičius, H., Van Leeuwen, F., Mazepus, H., Laustsen, L., & Tollefsen, A. F. (2023). Russia’s attacks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance. PNAS Nexus
29 Gijs Schumacher, Matthijs Rooduijn & Bert N. Bakker (2022). Hot Populism? Affective responses to antiestablishment Rhetoric. Political Psychology
30 Mark Brandt, & Bert N. Bakker (2022). The complicated but solvable threat-politics relationship. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences
31 Ariel Malka, Yphtach Lelkes, Bert N. Bakker, and Eliyahu Spivack (2022). Who is open to authoritarian governance in western democracies. Perspectives on Politics
32 Mazepus, H., & Toshkov, D. (2022). Standing up for democracy? Explaining citizens’ support for democratic checks and balances. Comparative Political Studies
33 Mazepus, H., van Leeuwen, F., Poama, A., & Aloyo, E. T. (2022). Moral Condemnation is Not Enough to Save Lives: What Drives Public Support for International Interventions? Preprint
34 Toshkov, D., Mazepus, H., Yordanova, N., & Piqani, D. (2022). Avoiding Public Backlash: Enforcing Rule of Law in the European Union. Preprint
35 Mazepus, H. (2022). Rose-colored glasses or suspicion? Effects of coalitional cues on evaluations of checks and balances reforms. Preprint
36 Harteveld, E., Mendoza, P., & Rooduijn, M. (2022). Affective polarization and the populist radical right: creating the hating? Government and Opposition
37 Maher, P. J., Lüders, A., Erisen, E., Rooduijn, M., & Jonas, E. M. (2022). The many guises of populism and crisis: Introduction to the special issue on populism and global crises. Political Psychology
38 Catherine De Vries, Bert N. Bakker, Sara B. Hobolt & Kevin Arceneaux (2021). Crisis signalling: How Italy’s Coronavirus lockdown affected incumbent support in other European countries. Political Science Research and Methods
39 Bert N. Bakker, Jaidka, K., Dorr, T., Fasching, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2021). Questionable and open research practices among quantitative communication researchers. Journal of Communication
40 Bert N. Bakker, Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Reconsidering the relationship between personality and political preferences. American Political Science Review
41 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Matthijs Rooduijn (2021). The populist appeal. Personality and anti-establishment communication. The Journal of Politics
42 Dimitrova, A., Mazepus, H., Toshkov, D., Chulitskaya, T., Rabava, N., & Ramasheuskaya, I. (2021). The dual role of state capacity in opening socio-political orders: assessment of different elements of state capacity in Belarus and Ukraine. East European Politics
43 Mazepus, H., Dimitrova, A., Frear, M., Chulitskaya, T., Keudel, O., Onopriychuk, N., & Rabava, N. (2021). Civil society and external actors: how linkages with the EU and Russia interact with socio-political orders in Belarus and Ukraine. East European Politics
44 Mazepus, H., Dimitrova, A., Frear, M., Toshkov, D., & Onopriychuk, N. (2021). When business and politics mix: Local networks and socio-political transformations in Ukraine. East European Politics and Societies
45 Frear, M., & Mazepus, H. (2021). Security, civilisation and modernisation: Continuity and change in the Russian Foreign policy discourse. Europe-Asia Studies
46 Spruyt, Bram, Matthijs Rooduijn, and Andrej Zaslove (2021). Ideologically consistent, but for whom? An empirical assessment of the populism-elitism-pluralism set of attitudes and the moderating role of political sophistication. Politics
47 De Bruycker, Iskander, and Matthijs Rooduijn  (2021). The People’s Champions? Populist Communication as a Contextually Dependent Political Strategy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
48 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Bart Bonikowski, and Jante Parlevliet (2021). Populist and nativist attitudes: does in-group/out-group thinking spill over across domains. European Union Politics
49 Burgoon, Brian, and Matthijs Rooduijn (2021). ‘Immigrationization’ of welfare politics? Anti-immigration and welfare attitudes in context  West European Politics 
50 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Matthijs Rooduijn (2020). Hot Politics? Affective responses to political rhetoric. American Political Science Review
51 Maaike Homan (2020). Alexander Todorov’s Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions. Politics and Life Sciences
52 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher & Maaike Homan (2020). Yikes. Are we disgusted by politicians? Politics and Life Sciences
53 Bert N. Bakker, Yphtach Lelkes & Ariel Malka (2020). Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests from predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives. The Journal of Politics
54 Bert N. Bakker, Gijs Schumacher, Claire Gothreau & Kevin Arceneaux (2020). Conservatives and Liberals have Similar Physiological Responses to Threats. Nature Human Behaviour
55 Toshkov, D., & Mazepus, H. (2020). Winning and losing democratic elections: Effects on political and social attitudes and subjective well-being. Preprint
56 Martijn Schoonvelde, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2019). Friends With Text as Data Benefits: Assessing and Extending the Use of Automated Text Analysis in Political Science and Political Psychology. Journal of Social and Political Psychology
57 Denise Traber, Martijn Schoonvelde & Gijs Schumacher (2019). Errors have been made, others will be blamed: Issue engagement and blame shifting in prime minister speeches during the economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research
58 Matthijs Rooduijn (2019). How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research
59 Gijs Schumacher & Ingo Zettler (2019). House of Cards or West Wing? Self-reported HEXACO Traits of Danish Politicians. Personality and Individual Differences
60 Martijn Schoonvelde, Anna Brosius, Gijs Schumacher & Bert N. Bakker (2019). Liberals Lecture, Conservatives Communicate: analyzing complexity and ideology in 381,475 speeches. PLoS One
61 Matthijs Rooduijn & Stijn van Kessel (2019). Populism and Euroscepticism in the European Union. Oxford Encyclopedia of European Union Politics
62 Burgoon, Brian, Sam van Noort, Matthijs Rooduijn & Geoffrey Underhill (2019). Positional Deprivation and Support for Radical Right And Radical Left Parties. Economic Policy 
63 Bonikowski, Bart, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Eric Kaufmann, and Matthijs Rooduijn  (2019). Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism 
64 Rooduijn, Matthijs  (2019). How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research 
65 Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., … & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe.
66 Bert N. Bakker & Yphtach Lelkes (2018). Selling Ourselves Short? How Abbreviated Measures of Personality Change the Way We Think about Personality and Politics. Journal of Politics
67 Matthijs Rooduijn & Brian Burgoon (2018). The Paradox of Wellbeing: Do Unfavorable Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting Among the Less Well-Off? Comparative Political Studies
68 Erik de Vries, Martijn Schoonvelde & Gijs Schumacher (2018). No Longer Lost in Translation: Evidence that Google Translate Works for Comparative Bag-of-Words Text Applications. Political Analysis
69 Rooduijn, Matthijs  (2018).  What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties in Western Europe. European Political Science Review 
70 Matthijs Rooduijn, Brian Burgoon, Erika van Elsas & Herman van de Werfhorst (2017). Radical Distinction: Support for Radical Left and Radical Right Parties in Europe. European Union Politics
71 Mariken van der Velden, Gijs Schumacher & Barbara Vis (2017). Living in the Past or Living in the Future? Analyzing Parties’ Platform Change In Between Elections,The Netherlands 1997–2014. Political Communication
72 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Brian Burgoon, Erika van Elsas & Herman van de Werfhorst (2017). Radical Distinction: Support for Radical Left and Radical Right Parties in Europe. European Union Politics 
73 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Wouter van der Brug, Sarah L de Lange & Jante Parlevliet (2017). Persuasive Populism? Estimating the Effect of Populist Messages on Political Cynicism. Politics and Governance 
74 Rooduijn, Matthijs & Tjitske Akkerman (2017). Flank Attacks: Populism and Left-Right Radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics 
75 Bert N. Bakker & Claes de Vreese (2016). Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions. European Union Politics
76 Bert N. Bakker, Matthijs Rooduijn, & Gijs Schumacher (2016). The Psychological Roots of Populist Voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research
77 Bert N. Bakker, Robert Klemmensen, Asbjørn Nørgaard & Gijs Schumacher (2016). Stay Loyal or Exit the Party? How Openness to Experience and Extraversion Explain Vote Switching. Political Psychology
78 Bert N. Bakker (2016). Personality traits, income and economic ideology. Political Psychology
79 Gijs Schumacher & Kees van Kersbergen (2016). Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics
80 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Wouter van der Brug & Sarah L de Lange (2016). Expressing or Fuelling Discontent? The Relationship Between Populist Voting and Political Discontent. Electoral Studies
81 Bert N. Bakker, David Hopmann, & Mikael Persson (2015). Personality traits and party identification over time. European Journal of Political Research
82 Gijs Schumacher, Marc van de Wardt, Barbara Vis & Michael Baggesen Klitgaard (2015). How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change. American Journal of Political Science
83 Akkerman, Tjitske & Matthijs Rooduijn  (2015). Pariahs or Partners? Inclusion and exclusion of radical right parties and the effects on their policy positions. Political Studies 
84 Rooduijn, Matthijs  (2014). The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator. Government and Opposition 
85 Rooduijn, Matthijs  (2014). The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies 
86 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Sarah L de Lange & Wouter van der Brug (2014). A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe. Party Politics
87 Rooduijn, Matthijs  (2014). Vox Populismus: A Populist Radical Right Attitude Among the Public. Nations and Nationalism 
88 Gijs Schumacher & Matthijs Rooduijn (2013). Sympathy for the ‘Devil’? Voting for Populists in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch General Elections. Electoral Studies
89 Gijs Schumacher, Catherine de Vries & Barbara Vis (2013). Why do Parties change Position? Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics
90 Rooduijn, Matthijs, Sarah L de Lange en Wouter van der Brug (2012). Een populistische tijdgeest? Discursieve reacties op het succes van populistische partijen in West-Europa. Sociologie 
91 Rooduijn, Matthijs & Teun Pauwels (2011). Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics
92 Gijs Schumacher, Bert N. Bakker, Matthijs Rooduijn, & Maaike D. Homan (2021). Politiek: Zweten, fronsen en walgen. Sociologie Magazine
93 Maaike D. Homan (2024). Citizens’ affective, cognitive and behavioral responses to the emotional displays of politicians. PhD dissertation
94 Isabella Rebasso (2023). Feeling Within Reason: How Appraisals Shape Emotional Responses to Politics. PhD dissertation
95 Christian Pipal (2024). Blueprints and fingerprints Politicians’ use of emotional appeals in European democracies. PhD dissertation
96 Christian Baden, Christian Pipal, Martijn Schoonvelde & Mariken van der Velden (2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures
97 Christian Pipal, Hyunjin Song, Hajo G Boomgaarden (2023). If you have choices, why not choose (and share) all of them? A multiverse approach to understanding news engagement on social media. Digital Journalism
98 Homan, M. D., Hamdan, M., Hendriks, K., & Petropoulus Petalas, D. (2024). Neural Responses to Emotional Displays by Politicians: Differential Mu and Alpha Suppression Patterns in Response to In-Party and Out-Party Leaders. Scientific Reports
Back To Top